Preponderance of Possibilities
Standard of proof in POSH cases: Preponderance of Possibilities The Prevention of Sexual Harassment ...
POSH – Understanding consent
What is Consent? Any activity that is sexual requires consent, which is defined as explicit and volu...
Tripura HC- Shila Debnath vs National Institute of Technology
The High Court held that the aggrieved woman was not heard during the entire inquiry proceedings. Th...
Amendments to the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules
To make public transport safer for women passengers, the Tamil Nadu State government has amended the...
Law on prevention of sexual harassment at workplace
Article by : S K Gupta, Advocate , Supreme Court of India, The various Acts have defined the [&helli...
Calcutta HC – Soumen Sarkar vs The State Of West Bengal
POSH Calcutta HC Soumen Sarkar vs The State Of West Bengal judgment dt 16 September 2021. This...
Chhattisgarh-HC-Dr Savitri Tripathi vs State of Chhattisgarh
The petitioner has filed the present petition contending that she is Senior Professor of English an...
Madras HC Mary Rajasekaran vs University of Madras judgment
In brief, the lady had raised a complaint on misappropriation of funds of the Alumina Association of...
Checklist for the IC while handling sexual harassment compliant
In an organization, only an ICC has the power to investigate complaints of sexual harassment. They h...
Mumbai HC – First of the kind guidelines issued by a High Court on POSH
These are the first of the kind guidelines issued by a High Court in relation to cases arising [&hel...