Preponderance of Possibilities
Standard of proof in POSH cases: Preponderance of Possibilities The Prevention of Sexual Harassment ...
Courts shouldn’t get swayed by ‘Hyper Technicalities”; Must consider broader context
This is an important judgment where Supreme Court held that in a case pertaining to sexual harassmen...
Understanding consent in the context of sexual harassment
What is Consent? Any activity that is sexual requires consent, which is defined as explicit and volu...
Tripura HC- Shila Debnath vs National Institute of Technology
The High Court held that the aggrieved woman was not heard during the entire inquiry proceedings. Th...
Amendments to the Tamil Nadu Motor Vehicles Rules
To make public transport safer for women passengers, the Tamil Nadu State government has amended the...
Law on prevention of sexual harassment at workplace
Article by : S K Gupta, Advocate , Supreme Court of India, The various Acts have defined the [&helli...
Madras HC – Mary Rajasekaran vs University of Madras judgment
In brief, the lady had raised a complaint on misappropriation of funds of the Alumina Association of...
Mumbai HC – First of the kind guidelines issued by a High Court on POSH
These are the first of the kind guidelines issued by a High Court in relation to cases arising [&hel...
Woman pilot moves Jammu & Kashmir High Court alleging sexual harassment
Case which is being heard by J & K HC. : Woman pilot moves Jammu & Kashmir High […]...
Madras HC – Woman IPS Officer allegedly sexually harassed
Madras HC woman IPS Officer allegedly sexually harassed stopped from filing complaint by DGP Madras ...